New York Food, Resource, and Commodity Assurance Act

STATE OF NEW YORK 2027-2028 REGULAR SESSION, NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATURE

---

SENATE/ASSEMBLY BILL ____

BY __________ (Introduced by request)

An act to amend the agriculture and markets law and the executive law, in relation to establishing the New York Food, Resource, and Commodity Assurance Act; creating an at-cost food assurance program and an at-cost essential goods program to ensure the material security of all New York residents; making appropriations; and providing for the effectiveness thereof.

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

LONG TITLE

AN ACT CONCERNING THE CREATION OF THE NEW YORK FOOD, RESOURCE, AND COMMODITY ASSURANCE ACT, and, in connection therewith, amending the agriculture and markets law to establish the New York Food Assurance Program; amending the executive law to create the New York Essential Goods Program; making appropriations from the general fund; and providing for the phased implementation and effective date thereof.

---

LEGISLATIVE DECLARATION

The Legislature hereby finds, determines, and declares that:

FINDINGS RELATING TO THE STRUCTURAL IMPERATIVE FOR STATE ACTION

(1) The federal government is structurally overloaded. There have been twenty-two federal government shutdowns since 1976, including a forty-three-day shutdown in 2025, the longest in United States history, which furloughed approximately 670,000 federal employees. The House of Representatives has been frozen at 435 seats by the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929, leaving approximately 762,000 constituents per representative. Federal H.R. 1 (2025) shifted the state share of SNAP administrative cost from fifty percent to seventy-five percent. New York has the authority to act under its own legislative power (Cooper, Paper VII, 2026).

(2) THE MULTIPLE-EXECUTIVE PRECEDENT. A workload that has outgrown a single office is an engineering problem with a documented solution. The Swiss Federal Council has operated as a seven-member executive with a rotating annual presidency since 1848, approximately one hundred seventy-eight years, sustaining citizen trust above eighty percent. The Roman Republic ran its executive as paired consuls for roughly four hundred eighty-two years. A government too large for one desk is not a partisan failure. It is a structural one, and structural problems have structural answers.

(u25) UNIVERSE 25 REBUTTAL. The Calhoun mouse experiment ("Universe 25") is frequently invoked against any abundance-distribution proposal. The argument is a misread. Calhoun's mice collapsed not because they had abundance, but because abundance arrived without institutional infrastructure: food, water, nesting material, and space, with no education, no governance, no intergenerational transmission, no civic role. Abundance of resources plus abundance of ease produces Universe 25. Abundance of resources plus structured civic obligation produces the Augustus annona (400 years), the Defense Commissary (159 years), and the Mabu Co settlement (800 years). The Roman grain dole was distributed to citizens who had civic obligations: military service, public works, jury duty, voting. The commissary is distributed to military families inside an institution that defines daily structure. The institutional scaffolding is what distinguishes sustainable abundance from collapse. The United States Military Academy at West Point, Fort Drum, Watervliet Arsenal, and the Hunts Point Food Distribution Center in the Bronx (the largest food distribution center in the United States) operate the at-cost-with-infrastructure template on New York soil today;

(3) DENIAL IS NO LONGER NEUTRAL. The evidence assembled in this declaration is arithmetic, federal accounting, public-health science, and operational record. Where the facts are not in dispute, the burden rests on denial.

FINDINGS RELATING TO GLOBAL CARRYING CAPACITY AND MATERIAL ABUNDANCE

(4) In 1925, Albrecht Penck, Professor of Geography at the University of Berlin, calculated that Earth could sustain approximately eight billion people using the agricultural technology then available. The world population at the time was approximately two billion, establishing a four-to-one surplus margin with century-old technology.

(5) The United States Census of Manufactures documents approximately 293,000 manufacturing establishments operating within the United States. Producing essential goods for the entire American population would require between 10,000 and 15,000 dedicated facilities, establishing a surplus ratio of 19.5 to 29.3 times the capacity required for universal provision [SOURCE: U.S. Census of Manufactures]. Federal Reserve data documents that American manufacturing operates at approximately 77 percent capacity utilization [SOURCE: Federal Reserve G.17]. The idle 23 percent of existing capacity reflects a demand constraint, not a supply constraint, because people cannot afford what factories could produce (Cooper, Paper III, 2025).

(6) Approximately 47.9 million Americans are food insecure [SOURCE: USDA Economic Research Service, Household Food Security in the United States]. The cost to close the food security gap is approximately $32 billion per year. The USDA marketing-share markup generates approximately $496 billion annually. The cost to feed every food-insecure American is approximately 6.5 percent of what the nation spends on the permission structure between farm and table.

(7) The United States Bureau of Labor Statistics Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages documents that the entire American grocery retail industry employs approximately 3.4 million workers generating approximately $32 billion in annual payroll. That payroll is approximately 6.5 percent of the grocery sector's roughly $900 billion in annual revenue, meaning approximately 93.5 percent of what consumers pay for groceries goes to something other than the direct labor of making food available.

(8) The USDA Economic Research Service Food Dollar Series documents that for every dollar spent on food in the United States, approximately 24.3 cents represents the farm share, the cost of growing, harvesting, and producing the food itself [SOURCE: USDA Economic Research Service, Food Dollar Series, 2023 data]. The remaining 75.7 cents is the marketing share: processing, packaging, transport, wholesale distribution, retail markup, advertising, and profit margins at each layer.

FINDINGS RELATING TO RETAIL COLLAPSE

(9) The American retail system is contracting under the weight of its own markup structure. In 2023, twenty-five major retail chains filed for bankruptcy. In 2024, forty-five filed, an eighty percent increase [SOURCE: Coresight Research]. More than 15,000 store closures were projected for 2025. Fifty-four million Americans live in food deserts. Neighborhoods redlined in the 1930s are 107 to 149 percent more likely to be food deserts today. The choice is between a designed transition and a disorderly one.

FINDINGS RELATING TO HISTORICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PRECEDENT

(10) At-cost public provision of staple food is not a new idea, and it is not a partisan one. Augustus, the first Roman emperor and a documented autocrat (Suetonius records him ordering a Roman knight named Pinarius stabbed on the spot for taking notes at a public assembly), formalized the annona civica, the grain distribution to approximately 200,000 Roman citizens, and treated it as infrastructure in the same category as the aqueducts. The annona ran more than four hundred years. Nerva expanded it with the alimenta, state-funded rural loans whose interest funded the nutrition of destitute children; the bronze accounting tablet, the Tabula Alimentaria from Veleia (CIL XI 1147), is in the Parma Museum and can still be visited. At Mabu Co on the Tibetan Plateau, sedentary settlement was sustained approximately 4,400 years ago at 4,446 meters (Nature Ecology and Evolution, September 2024). The Azolla Event records a freshwater fern editing Earth's atmosphere over roughly 800,000 years (Brinkhuis et al., Nature 441, 2006). The United States military commissary has run for one hundred fifty-nine years. The annona ran four hundred. The biological record runs across geologic time. The precedent for treating staple provision as infrastructure is older than the markup that now sits on top of it.

FINDINGS RELATING TO THE COMMISSARY MODEL

(11) The United States military commissary system, established by the Commissary Act of 1867 and now codified at 10 U.S.C. section 2484, administered by the Defense Commissary Agency, has operated continuously for one hundred fifty-nine years. The agency operates 236 stores worldwide, serving approximately 2.8 million authorized personnel, providing groceries and household goods at cost plus a surcharge of five percent. Commissary patrons save 17 to 25 percent below civilian retail prices domestically. The system is funded by approximately $1.3 billion in annual federal appropriation drawn from all taxpayers, including the more than 330 million civilians denied access to it. The commissary demonstrates that large-scale retail distribution at near-production cost is operationally sustainable across multiple generations.

(12) The United States Military Academy at West Point, the institutional origin of American military officer education, is located in New York State, sixty miles north of the Bronx. West Point cadets eat in a commissary-model dining system. The institution that trains America's military leaders operates at-cost distribution on New York soil, while approximately 2.9 million New Yorkers rely on SNAP benefits to afford food at retail markup.

(13) Fort Drum, home of the 10th Mountain Division, one of the most deployed units in the United States military, operates commissary facilities in northern New York. Watervliet Arsenal, the oldest continuously active arsenal in the United States, manufactures cannon barrels in Watervliet, New York. Military personnel at these installations access food at cost. Sixty miles from Fort Drum, the South Side of Syracuse is a food desert.

FINDINGS RELATING TO THE COMMODITY-SPECULATION MODEL

(14) New York is the headquarters of the commodity trading floors, futures markets, and financial intermediation firms whose activity sits between farm gate price and consumer retail price. This is a factual matter of corporate location, not an accusation: the institutions that intermediate the food markets are physically headquartered in lower Manhattan, and the state that houses that infrastructure also carries food insecurity within it.

(15) In 1991, Goldman Sachs, headquartered in New York City, created the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index, which opened food commodities to institutional investment at scale. Between 2005 and 2008, commodity-index investment is documented to have contributed to an approximately 80 percent rise in global food prices, a factor in food crises across more than thirty countries (Kaufman, Foreign Policy, 2011; FAO World Food Situation reports, 2008). New York-based financial instruments are part of the documented record of global food-cost inflation.

(16) Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, and Morgan Stanley are all headquartered in New York and all participate in commodity markets that price food above production cost. The 75.7 percent marketing share documented by the USDA passes through institutions located in this state, and New York residents then pay it at retail.

(17) The financial sector generates more than $100 billion annually in New York State gross domestic product, and financial-sector profits were projected by the New York State Comptroller in October 2025 to exceed $60 billion for the year. The same hierarchy-health gradient documented in the public-health findings below is widest in New York, because the distance between the top and the bottom of the income distribution is wider here than in any other state.

FINDINGS RELATING TO NEW YORK FOOD INSECURITY

(18) New York has the largest SNAP enrollment of any state, with approximately 2.9 million recipients as of 2024 (USDA Food and Nutrition Service; New York State Council on Hunger and Food Policy, 2024 Annual Report). New York City alone accounts for approximately 1.8 million SNAP recipients (Citizens' Committee for Children of New York, 2024).

(19) Approximately one in seven New Yorkers experiences food insecurity. In the Bronx, the poverty rate reached 27.9 percent in 2023 (U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey), and approximately one in four Bronx residents is food insecure, roughly twenty subway minutes from the financial district.

(20) New York City is among the United States cities with the most extensive food deserts. More than two dozen neighborhoods across the five boroughs experience limited access to affordable fresh food, concentrated in the Bronx, Central Brooklyn, Central Harlem, and the outer reaches of Queens (New York State Comptroller, April 2025).

FINDINGS RELATING TO NEW YORK AGRICULTURAL CAPACITY

(21) New York State is home to more than 33,000 farms across approximately seven million acres of agricultural land, generating billions of dollars in annual farm gate value (New York Department of Agriculture and Markets, 2024 Annual Report). New York ranks fifth nationally in milk production [SOURCE: American Dairy Association North East; U.S. dairy 2024 production statistics], with approximately 2,760 dairy farms producing approximately 16.5 billion pounds of milk annually, and second nationally in apple production. The state is also a major producer of grapes, maple syrup, cabbage, onions, and sweet corn.

(22) New York possesses approximately 12,441 manufacturing establishments employing approximately 611,490 workers (IndustrySelect database). The state's agricultural and manufacturing infrastructure is sufficient to provide food and essential goods to all New York residents at production cost plus reasonable distribution overhead.

(23) Despite this agricultural capacity, New York imports the majority of its food, especially to New York City. Food grown in the Hudson Valley, the Finger Lakes, and western New York is trucked past food deserts in the Bronx to be sold at markup downstate. The state grows the food. The distribution layer captures the margin. The Bronx goes without.

FINDINGS RELATING TO THE FISCAL REFRAME

(24) New Yorkers already pay for food insecurity. They pay for it through SNAP administration, through emergency-room visits driven by nutrition-related chronic disease, through homeless-shelter costs exceeding $4 billion annually, and through lost economic productivity. The cost is already in the budget. It is spent on consequences.

(25) The enacted All Funds budget for State Fiscal Year 2025-26 was approximately $254 billion, and the FY2027 Executive Budget proposed approximately $260 billion [SOURCE: New York State Division of the Budget]. This Act does not add new cost to the state budget of that order. It redirects existing expenditure by eliminating the 75.7 percent marketing markup at the distribution level and replacing downstream consequence spending with upstream provision.

FINDINGS RELATING TO PRODUCTION SABOTAGE

(26) Thorstein Veblen, in The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904) and Absentee Ownership (1923), documented that the financial interest of business ownership can diverge from the productive interest of the community, and that the restriction of output to maintain price levels is a recurring structural feature rather than an aberration. The 75.7 percent marketing share documented by the USDA is that divergence made measurable: roughly three-quarters of what Americans pay for food goes not to producing food but to intermediating and marking up access to food that already exists.

(27) John Kenneth Galbraith, in The New Industrial State (1967) and The Affluent Society (1958), documented the dependence effect, in which consumer wants are increasingly created by the same industrial system that satisfies them. Applied to food, much of the marketing share funds packaging, branding, and product differentiation that add cost without adding nutrition.

FINDINGS RELATING TO THE UPSTATE-DOWNSTATE DIVIDE

(28) New York contains one of the sharpest economic divides in America. The New York City metropolitan area generates approximately $1.8 trillion in gross domestic product. Upstate New York, including Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, Albany, the Adirondacks, and the Southern Tier, has experienced deindustrialization that mirrors the patterns documented in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Michigan.

(29) In Rochester, the Eastman Kodak Company employed approximately 62,000 workers at its peak in 1982, accounting for roughly half the region's economic activity; Kodak is now a fraction of its former size. In Syracuse, the Carrier Corporation, where Willis Carrier invented air conditioning in 1902, departed. In Buffalo, the Bethlehem Steel Lackawanna works closed in 1983; Buffalo, once the eighth largest city in America, now has less than half its peak population. In Schenectady, General Electric's original headquarters contracted from more than 30,000 employees to a fraction. In Binghamton, IBM's first manufacturing plants are largely gone.

(30) These five cities are the factory proof in concentrated form (Cooper, Paper III, 2025). The factories existed. They employed tens of thousands. They closed. The productive capacity was never replaced with equivalent employment. The deindustrialization pattern that contracted the American manufacturing belt runs directly through upstate New York.

FINDINGS RELATING TO THE CAPITALISM DISTINCTION

(31) This Act is not government ownership of the means of production. Section 1 contracts with private New York producers at production cost plus a five percent surcharge. Farms in the Hudson Valley stay private. Dairy operations upstate stay private. Fishing fleets stay private. Processing and trucking stay private. Currency continues for every good above the base list. In April 2026, the Mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani, announced La Marqueta as a city-owned grocery store, government ownership of the retail point. This Act is structurally different: it operates on the commissary model, which contracts with private supply chains. The Defense Commissary Agency has operated this way since 1867 without acquiring a single farm. Costco operates a private-sector parallel: membership-based, volume purchasing, near-cost pricing. This Act provides a floor. It is a citizens' Costco, not a state takeover.

FINDINGS RELATING TO AUTOMATION AND LABOR

(32) The retail contraction and autonomous freight are already reducing distribution employment. Aurora operates driverless freight between Dallas and Houston today. More than 15,000 store closures were projected for 2025. This Act does not cause that displacement; it provides a floor for the workers it reaches. The commissary employs truckers, warehouse staff, and clerks; at-cost distribution removes the profit markup, not the labor. Adam Smith warned in The Wealth of Nations, Book V, that a worker "whose whole life is spent in performing a few simple operations" loses the habit of exertion; the answer to displacement is not to deny it but to catch the displaced worker with material security while the labor market resettles.

FINDINGS RELATING TO PUBLIC HEALTH: WHY THIS ACT REACHES BEYOND BARE SURVIVAL

The findings below are the evidentiary record establishing why a food assurance program is a public-health intervention and not merely a welfare measure. They are the closing argument of this declaration.

(33) Michael Marmot's Whitehall Studies (1967 to the present), examining 10,308 British civil servants, all employed, all with healthcare access, none in absolute poverty, established that the lowest-grade civil servants experienced three times the mortality rate of the highest grade. Standard risk factors including smoking, cholesterol, and blood pressure explained less than forty percent of the gradient. Greater responsibility correlated with lower disease risk, not higher. Low control at work was the single largest factor. The gradient applied to heart disease, cancer, lung disease, depression, and suicide.

(34) Robert Sapolsky's thirty-year study of baboon populations in the Serengeti demonstrated that subordinate males exhibited elevated cortisol, accelerated atherosclerosis, and impaired stress recovery. When a tuberculosis outbreak removed the dominant aggressive males in one troop, the surviving subordinates' cortisol levels normalized within months. The biology followed the social structure.

(35) Carol Shively's thirty-year study of female macaques at Wake Forest University demonstrated that subordinate status produced visceral fat accumulation, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease through a cingulate cortex serotonin pathway linking depression to heart failure.

(36) Elizabeth Blackburn was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2009 for the finding that chronic psychological stress shortens telomeres, the protective caps on chromosomal DNA. Caregivers of chronically ill children exhibited measurably shorter telomeres than age-matched controls.

(37) Across these four research programs, six decades, and three species, the conclusion is consistent: the gap is the gradient, not the deprivation alone. Hierarchy itself is lethal, independent of absolute poverty. Treating sickness downstream of an untreated gradient is documented to fail. A food assurance program that lifts the floor narrows the gradient, and narrowing the gradient is a measurable public-health intervention (Cooper, Paper V, 2026).

(38) In New York City, life expectancy varies by more than ten years between the Bronx and Manhattan's Upper East Side, communities connected by the same subway system. This is the Whitehall gradient replicated on a transit map. The gradient does not require comparison across states or nations; in New York it is measurable across subway stops.

(39) The Bronx, the poorest urban county in New York State, with a 27.9 percent poverty rate in 2023, sits roughly twenty subway minutes from zip codes with median household incomes exceeding $200,000. The distance is hierarchical, and Marmot's research establishes that hierarchical distance carries a measurable mortality cost.

(40) The upstate cities that lost their manufacturing base, Rochester, Buffalo, Syracuse, Schenectady, and Binghamton, exhibit the pattern documented across the American manufacturing belt: factory closure produces status loss, status loss produces chronic cortisol elevation, and chronic cortisol elevation produces disease. New York's opioid burden is concentrated in the same communities that lost their manufacturing base. The factories provided wages, but they also provided social roles and community standing; when they closed, the roles were not replaced. The cortisol response is biological, not moral.

(41) The hierarchy-health gradient is not confined to the bottom of the income distribution. Finance workers in New York City exhibit elevated rates of cardiovascular disease and stress-related disorders despite high incomes, because the internal hierarchy of competitive firms is itself unstable. Sapolsky's research found cortisol elevation even among dominant individuals in unstable hierarchies. The gradient imposes a cost throughout the distribution; it imposes the largest cost at the bottom.

(42) New York City maintains the largest homeless shelter system in the nation, with more than 100,000 people in shelters on a typical night. The right-to-shelter obligation established by Callahan v. Carey (1981) and subsequent consent decrees requires the city to shelter every person who requests it, at an annual cost exceeding $4 billion.

(43) Chronic homelessness produces cortisol levels comparable to those documented in combat veterans and accelerates telomere shortening. Callahan v. Carey provides shelter but not the upstream material security that the food and essential-goods provisions of this Act are designed to deliver. The shelter system treats a symptom. This Act addresses the mechanism.

(44) First-generation immigrants to New York often demonstrate better health outcomes than native-born Americans despite lower incomes, a pattern known as the healthy immigrant effect, attributable to strong social networks and community cohesion. The advantage deteriorates with each successive generation as those networks weaken and the hierarchy-health gradient reasserts itself. The pattern confirms the central finding of this evidentiary record: community standing and material security, not absolute income alone, govern health outcomes.

(45) Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, in Schooling in Capitalist America (1976), named a real disease at the wrong site. They correctly identified that socioeconomic stratification reproduces across generations, but they assigned the engine of that reproduction to a single institution. Stratification is the ocean, not the cup. The gradient documented in the findings above runs through housing, diet, healthcare, and employment alike; it is not housed in any one institution. This Act addresses the gradient at the material floor, which is where the evidence says the mechanism operates (Cooper, Paper V, 2026). Denial is no longer neutral.

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NEW YORK FOOD ASSURANCE PROGRAM

The agriculture and markets law is amended by adding a new article 28-C to read as follows:

ARTICLE 28-C NEW YORK FOOD ASSURANCE PROGRAM

Section 289-a. Definitions. Section 289-b. Establishment of Program. Section 289-c. Covered Goods. Section 289-d. Procurement and Distribution. Section 289-e. Pricing and Cost Structure. Section 289-f. Eligibility. Section 289-g. Advisory Board.

289-a. Definitions. As used in this article:

(1) "Program" means the New York Food Assurance Program established pursuant to this article.

(2) "Production cost" means the verified cost of growing, harvesting, processing, and transporting food and consumable goods, exclusive of speculative commodity market pricing, marketing expenditure, retail markup, and shareholder profit extraction.

(3) "Commissary model" means the distribution methodology derived from the United States military commissary system (10 U.S.C. section 2484), providing goods at production cost plus a surcharge not to exceed five percent for operational overhead.

(4) "Covered goods" means the food and consumable goods distributed through the Program pursuant to section 289-c of this article.

289-b. Establishment of Program. There is hereby established within the Department of Agriculture and Markets the New York Food Assurance Program. The Program shall:

(1) Establish and operate regional distribution centers throughout the state using the commissary model.

(2) Procure food and consumable goods directly from New York producers, regional agricultural cooperatives, and verified wholesale suppliers at production cost.

(3) Distribute food and consumable goods to all New York residents at production cost plus a surcharge not to exceed five percent for operational overhead.

(4) Prioritize procurement from New York farms and manufacturers, with emphasis on the state's dairy, apple, grape, vegetable, and grain producers.

(5) Establish distribution centers in identified food deserts, including but not limited to the Bronx, Central Brooklyn, Central Harlem, the outer reaches of Queens, the South Side of Syracuse, the East Side of Buffalo, the northeast neighborhoods of Rochester, and rural communities across the Southern Tier, the North Country, and the Adirondack region.

289-c. Covered Goods. The covered goods distributed through the Program shall include:

(1) Food and groceries, including fresh produce, dairy, grains, proteins, preserved goods, and staple ingredients.

(2) Personal hygiene products, including soap, toothpaste, dental care items, feminine hygiene products, and similar necessities.

(3) Household cleaning supplies.

(4) Basic clothing and footwear, sized for all ages, distributed seasonally.

(5) School supplies for students enrolled in public education.

(6) Infant and childcare supplies, including diapers, formula, and age-appropriate nutrition.

Covered goods shall be distributed at production cost plus the five percent operational surcharge. No covered good shall be subject to speculative pricing, commodity market fluctuation, or retail markup beyond verified production and distribution cost.

289-d. Procurement and Distribution. The Department shall:

(1) Establish direct procurement relationships with New York agricultural producers, prioritizing family farms and agricultural cooperatives.

(2) Utilize existing state infrastructure, including but not limited to state fairgrounds, agricultural extension offices, National Guard armories, and underutilized state-owned facilities, for distribution center siting.

(3) Coordinate with the New York State Department of Transportation for logistics, prioritizing routes that connect agricultural production regions with identified food deserts.

(4) Establish cold chain infrastructure sufficient to preserve dairy, produce, and perishable goods throughout the distribution network.

(5) Develop partnerships with the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, the Mohawk, Onondaga, Oneida, Cayuga, Seneca, and Tuscarora nations, respecting their sovereign governance structures and traditional agricultural knowledge. Any partnership with the Haudenosaunee nations shall be structured as government-to-government cooperation, not imposition.

289-e. Pricing and Cost Structure.

(1) All covered goods distributed through the Program shall be priced at verified production cost plus a surcharge not to exceed five percent for operational overhead.

(2) The Department shall publish quarterly cost audits documenting: (a) Farm gate prices paid to producers; (b) Processing and transportation costs; (c) Operational overhead; and (d) The surcharge applied.

(3) No speculative commodity pricing, futures market benchmarking, or financial intermediation fee shall be incorporated into the cost structure of the Program. Commodity-index instruments that decouple food prices from production costs shall have no bearing on prices within the Program.

289-f. Eligibility.

(1) All residents of the State of New York shall be eligible to purchase goods through the Program.

(2) The Program is a universal access system, not a means-tested welfare program. No income verification, asset testing, or qualification procedure shall be required for access.

(3) Existing SNAP, WIC, and other federal nutrition assistance benefits shall remain fully available and may be used within the Program's distribution centers.

289-g. Advisory Board. There is hereby established the New York Food Assurance Advisory Board, consisting of:

(1) The Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets, or designee, who shall serve as chair; (2) Three representatives of New York agricultural producers; (3) Two representatives of food-insecure communities, including at least one representative from New York City and one from upstate; (4) One representative of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, selected by the Confederacy's own governance process; (5) One representative of the State University of New York agricultural extension system; (6) One public health professional with expertise in nutrition; (7) Two members of the public appointed by the Governor.

SECTION 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NEW YORK ESSENTIAL GOODS PROGRAM

The executive law is amended by adding a new article 49-C to read as follows:

ARTICLE 49-C NEW YORK ESSENTIAL GOODS PROGRAM

Section 998-a. Establishment and Covered Durable Goods. Section 998-b. Pricing. Section 998-c. Administration.

998-a. Establishment and Covered Durable Goods. There is hereby established the New York Essential Goods Program, an at-cost distribution program for durable essential goods. The Program shall make available, at production cost, durable goods that are used over time rather than consumed, including but not limited to:

(1) Household furnishings and basic appliances; (2) Tools and equipment for trade, craft, and professional use; (3) Electronics and communication devices.

The Essential Goods Program is universally accessible to all New York residents. It carries no precondition, no developmental gate, and no qualification procedure. It is the durable-goods counterpart to the Food Assurance Program established in Section 1, and it is the Resource and Commodity component named in the title of this Act.

998-b. Pricing. All goods distributed through the Essential Goods Program shall be priced at verified production cost plus a surcharge not to exceed five percent for operational overhead, on the same commissary-model basis as the Food Assurance Program. No speculative pricing or financial intermediation fee shall be incorporated into the cost structure.

998-c. Administration. The Department of Economic Development, in coordination with the Department of Agriculture and Markets, shall administer the Essential Goods Program, including procurement, quality standards, inventory management, and distribution logistics, and shall publish quarterly cost audits on the same basis required of the Food Assurance Program.

GENERAL PROVISIONS

SECTION 3. APPROPRIATIONS AND FISCAL ARCHITECTURE

(1) For the State Fiscal Year commencing April 1, 2028, and each fiscal year thereafter, there is hereby appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Agriculture and Markets the sum necessary for the establishment and operation of the Food Assurance Program, not to exceed two billion dollars ($2,000,000,000) in the initial fiscal year, scaling over five years.

(2) For the State Fiscal Year commencing April 1, 2028, and each fiscal year thereafter, there is hereby appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Economic Development the sum necessary for the establishment and operation of the Essential Goods Program, not to exceed five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000) in the initial fiscal year, scaling over five years.

(3) THE FOOD PROGRAM TARGET. At the comprehensive staple basket documented in the Fiscal Baseline Tables (Table 1, $609 per person per year at production cost), serving New York's population of approximately 19.87 million residents [SOURCE: U.S. Census Bureau, Vintage 2025], the Food Assurance Program at full scale requires approximately $12.1 billion per year. Measured against New York's General Fund of approximately $126.8 billion [SOURCE: NASBO, FY2027], this is approximately 9.5 percent. New York's per-capita General Fund spend, approximately $6,382 per resident, is the highest of any state, and the state's fiscal capacity comfortably supports the full basket. The conservative phase-in floor (Table 2, $309 per person per year) is approximately $6.14 billion, approximately 4.8 percent of the General Fund. The combined initial appropriation of $2.5 billion is startup funding; the program scales over five years toward the Table 1 target.

(4) THE FEDERAL SNAP COST-SHIFT IMPOSED ON NEW YORK. Federal H.R. 1 (2025) increased the state share of SNAP administrative cost from fifty percent to seventy-five percent, effective October 1, 2026. New York has the largest SNAP enrollment in the nation, approximately 2.9 million recipients. The state-share increase imposes hundreds of millions of dollars in additional annual General Fund cost without a corresponding increase in federal benefit amounts. New York currently routes SNAP benefits through commercial retailers, where 75.7 cents of every dollar pays for markup rather than food. Routed at cost through the Food Assurance Program's distribution centers, approximately 95 cents of every dollar reaches the recipient as food (production cost plus the five percent surcharge). That is a measurable increase in delivered food value per SNAP dollar, a mechanism that independently offsets a portion of the federal cost-shift.

(5) DOWNSTREAM COST AVOIDANCE. New York City's homeless shelter system costs exceed $4 billion annually. Emergency department utilization for nutrition-related conditions, Medicaid expenditure on diet-related chronic disease, and criminal-justice costs attributable to poverty each represent billions in annual state expenditure. A conservative ten percent reduction in these costs, achievable within ten years of full implementation, recovers a multiple of the appropriation.

(6) THE FISCAL CONVERGENCE. The arithmetic says ending the gap costs a single-digit percentage of the markup the State already pays. The operational template has run for one hundred fifty-nine years inside the same federal apparatus the State already funds. New York is not asked to attempt something untested. New York is asked to deliver to its own residents what the families at West Point and Fort Drum have received since 1867.

(7) THE FISCAL LOCK. These appropriations represent a redirection of existing expenditure, not new taxation. The State of New York already spends, on the downstream consequences of food insecurity, nutrition-related chronic disease, homelessness, and emergency shelter, more than the amounts appropriated herein. The argument that New York cannot afford this Act is answered by the state's existing expenditure on the less efficient version of the same outcomes. The fiscal question is not whether to spend, but whether to continue spending on consequences instead of provision while absorbing a federal SNAP cost-shift the state did not request. Denial is no longer neutral.

SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY

If any provision of this act, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of the act and the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE

(1) This act shall take effect on April 1, 2028, aligned with the State Fiscal Year. The Department of Agriculture and Markets and the Department of Economic Development shall begin establishing program infrastructure immediately upon enactment.

(2) The Food Assurance Program and the Essential Goods Program shall be phased in over a period of five years: (a) Year 1: regional distribution centers established in identified food desert communities, prioritizing the Bronx, Central Brooklyn, Central Harlem, the South Side of Syracuse, the East Side of Buffalo, and rural communities of the Southern Tier and North Country; (b) Years 2 and 3: expansion to all regions of the state; (c) Years 4 and 5: full statewide operation at the program target scale.

LEGISLATIVE ROUTING NOTE

This bill shall be referred jointly to:

COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENT:

- Senate Agriculture Committee - Senate Commerce, Economic Development, and Small Business Committee - Senate Finance Committee - Assembly Agriculture Committee - Assembly Economic Development Committee - Assembly Ways and Means Committee

FLOOR VOTE:

Passage requires a simple majority in both chambers: Senate, 32 of 63 members Assembly, 76 of 150 members

EXECUTIVE:

Requires the Governor's signature, or a veto override by a two-thirds majority in both chambers.

HISTORY:

This Act is the New York adaptation of a food assurance bill first formally drafted in 2015-2016 in Colorado through the Sassafras and Maple Research Foundation. The New York adaptation was drafted March 5, 2026. The full version history is maintained in the bill's verification-references companion file.

REFERENCES

The research and citations supporting this Act are drawn from federal data sources, peer-reviewed scientific literature, state reports, and the Historical Apoplexy (Cooper) paper series:

FOOD SYSTEMS AND ECONOMICS: - USDA Economic Research Service. Food Dollar Series (24.3 cents farm share, 75.7 cents marketing share, 2023 data). - USDA Economic Research Service. Household Food Security in the United States (47.9 million food insecure). - USDA Economic Research Service. Food Expenditure Series (food-at- home spending approximately $1.09 trillion, 2024). - U.S. Census of Manufactures; Federal Reserve G.17, Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization. - 10 U.S.C. section 2484, Military Commissary Act. - Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA). 236 stores, approximately 2.8 million authorized patrons, 17 to 25 percent savings below civilian retail. - Government Accountability Office. GAO-19-344, Defense Commissaries. - Veblen, T. (1904). The Theory of Business Enterprise. - Veblen, T. (1923). Absentee Ownership. - Galbraith, J.K. (1958). The Affluent Society. - Galbraith, J.K. (1967). The New Industrial State. - Penck, A. (1925). Earth carrying-capacity calculation. - Kaufman, F. (2011). How Goldman Sachs Created the Food Crisis. Foreign Policy. - Coresight Research. Retail bankruptcy and store-closure data, 2023-2025.

HIERARCHY AND HEALTH: - Marmot, M. (2004). The Status Syndrome. Times Books. - Marmot, M.G. et al. (1991). Whitehall II study. The Lancet. - Sapolsky, R.M. (2017). Behave. Penguin Press. - Shively, C.A. et al. (2009). Social Stress and Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis. Obesity. - Blackburn, E. and Epel, E. (2017). The Telomere Effect. - Bowles, S. and Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in Capitalist America (cited for the targeting-error correction). - Callahan v. Carey, N.Y. Sup. Ct. (1981). Right to shelter.

HISTORICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PRECEDENT: - Suetonius. Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Augustus (annona civica; the Pinarius record at Life of Augustus 27). - Cassius Dio; Appian (the annona and the Nerva alimenta). - CIL XI 1147. Tabula Alimentaria from Veleia, Parma Museum. - Yang, Y. et al. Nature Ecology and Evolution (2024). Mabu Co. - Brinkhuis, H. et al. Nature 441 (2006). The Azolla Event.

HISTORICAL APOPLEXY SERIES (Cooper): - Cooper, I. (2025). Historical Apoplexy (Paper I). - Cooper, I. (2025). The Mathematics of Abundance (Paper III). - Cooper, I. (2025). Stolen Futures (Paper IV). - Cooper, I. (2026). The Targeting Error (Paper V). - Cooper, I. (2026). The Structural Overload (Paper VII). - Cooper, I. (2026). Venus Prime (Paper VIII).

NEW YORK-SPECIFIC DATA: - New York State Division of the Budget. FY2026 Enacted Financial Plan; FY2027 Executive Budget Overview. - National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO). New York, FY2027 (General Fund approximately $126.8 billion; State Operating Funds approximately $157.4 billion). - New York State Comptroller (2025). Financial-sector profit projection; food-desert report, April 2025. - USDA / NASS (2024). State Agriculture Overview, New York. - New York Department of Agriculture and Markets (2024). Annual Report (more than 33,000 farms, approximately seven million acres). - American Dairy Association North East; U.S. dairy 2024 production statistics (New York fifth nationally in milk production). - New York State Council on Hunger and Food Policy (2024). Annual Report. - New York Health Foundation (2025). Hunger on the Rise. - U.S. Census Bureau. American Community Survey, Bronx poverty rate 27.9 percent (2023); Vintage 2025 state population estimates. - Hunts Point Cooperative Market; New York State Comptroller, Economic Snapshot of the Hunts Point Food Distribution Center. - IndustrySelect database. New York manufacturing establishments.

END OF BILL

New York Food, Resource, and Commodity Assurance Act State of New York, 2027-2028 Regular Session

Every number in this proposal can be verified by a fifth grader with a calculator. The commissary has run since 1867. The factories stand at 77 percent. New York grows the food. The only missing element is the decision.

---

Verification notes & full source chain

Constitutional path: Legislative path only.

Distribution-model precedent: The U.S. Defense Commissary Agency (10 U.S.C. § 2484), operational since 1867, sells groceries at cost plus a five-percent maintenance surcharge with no profit allowed by law. 2.8 million authorized users, 236 stores worldwide, $4 billion annual sales, $1.3 billion federal appropriation paid by all taxpayers including the 330+ million civilians denied access. This bill extends the same at-cost distribution model to all residents of New York.

Public-health-equity evidence: The Marmot Whitehall Studies (1967-present), Sapolsky's Serengeti baboons, Shively's cynomolgus macaques, and Blackburn's Nobel-winning telomere research establish that hierarchy itself kills across four research programmes, six decades, and three species. The gap is the gradient. Food assurance reaches beyond bare survival because the gradient damages population health even where calorie minimums are met.

Abundance arithmetic: 293,000 U.S. manufacturing facilities at 77 percent utilization; 19.5-29.3× the productive overcapacity required to provide universal abundance in consumer goods. 47.9 million Americans food-insecure; $32 billion ends domestic hunger; $496 billion is the annual U.S. food-industry markup over production cost; the gap is operational evidence of manufactured scarcity, not evidence of resource constraint. See Paper III, The Mathematics of Abundance.