Wisconsin Food, Resource, and Commodity Assurance Act

     ONE HUNDRED SEVENTH LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN
                          2025-2026 Session

---

                          SENATE/ASSEMBLY BILL ____

BY __________ (Introduced by request)

CONCERNING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A STATE PROGRAM FOR FOOD AND COMMODITY ASSURANCE TO ENSURE THE MATERIAL SECURITY OF ALL WISCONSIN RESIDENTS, AND, IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AMENDING CHAPTER 93 OF THE WISCONSIN STATUTES, MAKING APPROPRIATIONS, AND PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATES.

                             A BILL FOR AN ACT

LONG TITLE

AN ACT RELATING TO THE CREATION OF THE WISCONSIN FOOD, RESOURCE, AND COMMODITY ASSURANCE ACT, AND, IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, ESTABLISHING THE WISCONSIN FOOD ASSURANCE PROGRAM AND THE WISCONSIN ESSENTIAL GOODS PROGRAM BY CREATING NEW SECTIONS IN CHAPTER 93 OF THE WISCONSIN STATUTES; MAKING APPROPRIATIONS; AND PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATES AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULES.

LEGISLATIVE ROUTING NOTE

Wisconsin does not have a citizen initiative process for the enactment of statutes. Under Article IV of the Wisconsin Constitution, the legislative power is vested in the Senate and Assembly. Article XIII, Section 10 permits advisory referenda only; no binding citizen initiative exists for statutory enactment.

INTRODUCTION: This bill may be introduced by any member of the Wisconsin State Senate or Wisconsin State Assembly. Under Joint Rule 52, all proposals shall be reproduced on paper 8-1/2 by 11 inches. Each bill shall have a title, an enacting clause, and subject matter disposed of in one or more sections. The Legislative Reference Bureau (LRB), a nonpartisan agency established in 1901, provides free bill drafting services to all legislators and is available to draft this proposal in final statutory form upon request by a sponsoring legislator.

COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENT: Upon introduction, this bill would likely be assigned to the Senate Committee on Agriculture and Tourism or the Assembly Committee on Agriculture, with concurrent referral to the Joint Committee on Finance for fiscal review under Wisconsin Statutes Section 13.093. The Joint Committee on Finance has authority under Section 13.10 of the Wisconsin Statutes to review and approve all fiscal legislation and controls final approval of many state appropriations.

FISCAL NOTE: The Legislative Fiscal Bureau prepares fiscal estimates for all bills with budgetary impact, as required by Joint Rule 41.

FLOOR VOTE: Simple majority in each chamber (17 of 33 Senators; 50 of 99 Representatives). Governor's signature or veto override (two-thirds of each chamber, under Article V, Section 10 of the Wisconsin Constitution). The Governor also possesses partial veto authority under Article V, Section 10(1)(b).

SESSION: The 2025-2026 session of the One Hundred Seventh Legislature. Wisconsin operates on a biennial budget cycle, with the state fiscal year running from July 1 through June 30.

HISTORY: A version of this proposal was first developed in 2016 through the Sassafras and Maple Research Foundation (SMRF), the first non-partisan political trade school in the United States, registered with the Colorado Department of Higher Education, Division of Private Occupational Schools (DPOS). The original proposal was sidelined during the 2016-2017 Colorado legislative cycle. The present version incorporates updated research from the Historical Apoplexy series (Cooper, 2025-2026), a ten-paper academic work providing the evidentiary foundation for this legislation, and has been adapted to Wisconsin's specific legal framework, educational institutions, and agricultural economy.

LEGISLATIVE DECLARATION

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. Legislative findings and declaration.

    (1) The legislature hereby finds, determines, and declares that:

    FINDINGS RELATING TO THE STRUCTURAL IMPERATIVE FOR STATE
    ACTION:

    (a0) Twenty-two federal government shutdowns since 1976,
    including a forty-three-day shutdown in 2025. The House frozen
    at 435 since 1929; 762,000 constituents per representative,
    worst in the OECD. Federal H.R. 1 (2025) shifted SNAP
    administrative costs from fifty percent to seventy-five percent
    state share. The federal machine is structurally overloaded
    (Cooper, Paper VII, 2026). This state has the authority to act
    under its own legislative power rather than await federal
    action that structural overload prevents;

    (a0a) THE MULTI-EXECUTIVE PRECEDENT. The Swiss Federal
    Council has operated as a seven-member rotating-presidency
    collegial executive since 1848, one hundred seventy-eight
    (178) years of continuous operation, with citizen trust
    consistently above eighty percent (80%) [SOURCE: admin.ch
    Federal Council History, 2026]. The Roman Republic operated
    under dual consuls for four hundred eighty-two (482) years
    (509 BC to 27 BC). Uruguay operated a nine-member National
    Council of Government from 1952 to 1967. Bosnia and
    Herzegovina has operated a tripartite rotating presidency
    since 1995. The single-executive overloaded design is not
    the only functioning executive model; multi-executive
    collegial systems demonstrably function at state and
    national scale, with measurably higher institutional trust
    than the United States federal apparatus currently delivers.
    The State of Wisconsin acts unilaterally because federal
    structural overload is not a temporary condition but a
    structural one;

    (a1) DENIAL IS NO LONGER NEUTRAL. Inaction by a legislature
    possessing the authority, capacity, and documented need to act
    constitutes active harm. The burden rests on denial;

    FINDINGS RELATING TO FOOD AND COMMODITY INSECURITY:

    (a) According to the United States Department of Agriculture
    Economic Research Service, 13.5 percent of United States households
    experienced food insecurity in 2023, and 5.1 percent experienced
    very low food security. Feeding America Eastern Wisconsin reports
    that nearly one in eight people in its thirty-five-county service
    area face food insecurity, with demand at food pantries increasing
    by thirty (30) percent since 2022. Applied to Wisconsin's
    population of approximately 5.9 million, approximately 650,000 to
    740,000 Wisconsinites lack consistent access to adequate food;

    (b) Wisconsin's agricultural sector generates approximately $15.3
    billion in annual cash receipts from farm marketings (USDA National
    Agricultural Statistics Service, Wisconsin 2025 Agricultural
    Statistics), with milk sales alone totaling $6.97 billion and
    livestock, dairy, and poultry comprising seventy-one (71) percent
    of total marketings. Wisconsin cheesemakers produce twenty-five
    (25) percent of the nation's cheese, totaling 3.58 billion pounds
    in 2024, and the state produced 1.02 billion pounds of specialty
    cheeses, leading the nation. Wisconsin exported $3.97 billion of
    agricultural and food products to one hundred fifty-one (151)
    countries in 2024. Wisconsin's productive capacity far exceeds its
    population's food requirements. Food insecurity in Wisconsin is a
    distribution problem, not a production problem;

    (c) Wisconsin ranks first nationally in the production of
    cranberries, producing 5.49 million barrels in 2024, representing
    sixty-two (62) percent of the nation's crop (USDA NASS, Wisconsin
    Cranberry Production, 2024). Wisconsin ranks first in ginseng
    production, first in beet acres for processing, first in Chinese
    pea acres, and possesses 220,975 acres of harvested vegetables,
    fifth in the nation and more than any neighboring state (2022
    Census of Agriculture). Wisconsin produced 32.4 billion pounds of
    milk in 2024. The state's agricultural output can feed a population
    many times its own;

    (d) The United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research
    Service Food Dollar Series establishes that the farm share of the
    United States food dollar is 24.3 cents, with the remaining 75.7
    cents allocated to processing, transportation, wholesale, retail,
    and food service markup. Total United States food-at-home spending
    is approximately $1.09 trillion; production cost is approximately
    $213 to $327 billion. The difference of approximately $496 billion
    represents markup above production cost;

    (e) The cost to close the food insecurity gap for all 47.9 million
    food-insecure Americans is approximately $32 billion, which
    represents 6.5 percent of the $496 billion markup between
    production cost and retail price (Cooper, "The Mathematics of
    Abundance," 2025);

    (f) The United States military commissary system, established by
    the Military Commissary Act of 1867 and now codified at 10 U.S.C.
    Section 2484, is operated by the Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA)
    across approximately 236 stores worldwide and has provided at-cost
    food distribution continuously for one hundred fifty-nine (159)
    years, delivering savings of 17 to 25 percent below civilian
    retail prices domestically and up to 44 percent overseas for the roughly 2.8 million-member United States military. This program is funded
    by approximately $1.3 billion in annual appropriations from all
    federal taxpayers, including Wisconsin taxpayers, but available
    only to military families and retirees, establishing a proven
    precedent for government-operated at-cost food distribution;

    (g) The geographer Albrecht Penck calculated in 1925 that Earth's
    carrying capacity was eight billion people using 1920s agricultural
    technology. The current world population is approximately eight
    billion. Since agricultural technology has advanced substantially
    beyond 1920s capacity, scarcity of food is not a physical
    constraint but a distribution and policy constraint (Penck, 1925;
    Cohen, "How Many People Can the Earth Support?," 1995);

    (h) The United States has approximately 293,000 manufacturing
    facilities. Studies indicate that 10,000 to 15,000 facilities
    would suffice for universal material abundance, representing 20
    to 30 times overcapacity, with United States manufacturing
    currently operating at approximately 77 percent capacity
    utilization (Federal Reserve, Cooper, "The Mathematics of
    Abundance," 2025). Wisconsin's manufacturing sector alone
    generates nearly $70 billion annually and employs 575,000 workers
    across 92,000 firms (Thomasnet, 2025), demonstrating that the
    state possesses substantial in-state productive capacity;

    (i) In 2024 alone, 7,325 retail grocery store locations closed
    in the United States (Cooper, "Stolen Futures," 2025), while
    54 million Americans live in food deserts. The commercial retail
    grocery model is collapsing as a distribution system. Wisconsin's
    rural character makes grocery deserts especially dangerous to
    communities that depend on local retail access;

    (j) The economist John Kenneth Galbraith described in "The
    Affluent Society" (1958) the condition of "private opulence and
    public squalor", the coexistence of enormous private productive
    capacity with inadequate public provision of basic needs. This
    condition persists in Wisconsin, where the state's agricultural
    and manufacturing output vastly exceeds its population's material
    requirements;

    (k) The economist Thorstein Bunde Veblen, born July 30, 1857,
    in Cato Township, Manitowoc County, Wisconsin, to Norwegian
    immigrant farmers Thomas and Kari Bunde Veblen, documented in
    "The Theory of the Leisure Class" (1899) the phenomenon of
    conspicuous consumption, and in "The Engineers and the Price
    System" (1921) the deliberate restriction of production capacity
    by business interests to maintain prices above production cost, a
    practice he termed the "conscious withdrawal of efficiency."
    Wisconsin's own native son diagnosed the disease of artificial
    scarcity over a century ago. The gap between Wisconsin's
    productive capacity and its residents' material security reflects
    the structural dynamic Veblen identified (Wisconsin Historical
    Society; MNopedia; Encyclopedia.com);

    FINDINGS RELATING TO HISTORICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PRECEDENT:

    (l1) HISTORICAL PRECEDENT, AUGUSTUS, PINARIUS, AND THE
    ANNONA. Augustus Caesar formalized the annona civica
    (the public grain distribution) around 27 BC, providing
    monthly grain to approximately two hundred thousand
    (200,000) Roman citizens at state expense for more than
    four hundred (400) years (Suetonius, Life of Augustus,
    Loeb Classical Library; Cassius Dio, Roman History; Appian,
    Civil Wars 4.5). Suetonius records, in Life of Augustus 27,
    that Augustus, having noticed a Roman knight named Pinarius
    taking notes during a public assembly, ordered that he be
    stabbed on the spot, suspecting him of being an eavesdropper
    and a spy. Even Augustus, who would have a man killed for
    taking notes in the wrong room, understood that hungry
    citizens are broken infrastructure. The annona was not
    charity. It was engineering. Wisconsin's own native son
    Thorstein Veblen, born July 30, 1857, in Cato Township,
    Manitowoc County, identified in 1921 that the same
    productive capacity which Roman emperors deployed for the
    public good is, under modern industrial capitalism,
    deliberately withheld through what he termed the
    "conscious withdrawal of efficiency." Wisconsin diagnosed
    the disease before there was a name for it;

    (l1a) NERVA, THE ALIMENTA, AND THE BRONZE THAT STILL
    EXISTS. Emperor Nerva (96-98 AD) expanded Augustus's
    program through the alimenta: state-funded rural loans
    whose interest payments funded child nutrition and orphan
    support across Italian municipalities (Cassius Dio, Roman
    History). The Tabula Alimentaria from Veleia, cataloged at
    CIL XI 1147, is the bronze inscription recording loan
    amounts, land parcels, and child-support payments under
    the alimenta program. The bronze still exists. It can be
    visited at the Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Parma. Two
    thousand years on, the public accounting of feeding
    children remains in the metal;

    (l1b) MABU CO AND THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF SEDENTARY ABUNDANCE.
    Yang et al. (Nature Ecology & Evolution, September 2024)
    documented sedentary settlement at Mabu Co on the Tibetan
    Plateau, four thousand four hundred forty-six (4,446)
    meters elevation, sustained for approximately eight hundred
    (800) years beginning approximately four thousand four
    hundred (4,400) years ago. Sedentary abundance at high
    altitude predates industrial technology by four millennia;

    (l1c) AZOLLA AND THE BIOLOGY OF PLANETARY-SCALE EDITING.
    Brinkhuis et al. (Nature 441, 2006, pp. 606-609) documented
    the Eocene Azolla Event: the freshwater fern Azolla, in
    symbiosis with the cyanobacterium Anabaena azollae,
    proliferated across the Arctic Ocean approximately 49
    million years ago and drew down sufficient atmospheric
    carbon dioxide over an 800,000-year interval to contribute
    to Earth's transition from hothouse to icehouse climate.
    One organism, replicating exponentially across a water
    surface, edited a planet's atmosphere. Azolla is
    additionally deployable today at state-agricultural scale
    as aquaculture feedstock and poultry feed (Cooper, Paper
    VIII, 2026). Wisconsin's existing aquaculture infrastructure
    in cranberry-bog watershed lands is a fit-for-purpose
    deployment surface;

    (l1d) THREE-RECORD CONVERGENCE. The United States military
    commissary has operated continuously for one hundred
    fifty-nine (159) years (1867 to present), under statutory
    authority at 10 U.S.C. § 2484, delivering at-cost food to
    authorized users at savings of seventeen to forty-four
    percent (17% to 44%) below civilian retail. The Roman
    annona ran for more than four hundred (400) years as an
    archaeologically documented program. The Azolla Event
    edited planetary climate across geologic time. Three
    records, three time-scales, one mechanism: distributed
    institutional or biological capacity converted into
    civilization-scale provision. The argument that this
    state cannot operate the same model is refuted by the
    fact that the model has already been operated, on
    Wisconsin soil, by the same federal apparatus that this
    state's taxpayers fund, for one hundred fifty-nine years
    at Fort McCoy in Sparta;

    (l2) PREEMPTIVE CAPITALISM-VS-COMMUNISM DISTINCTION. This
    Act is NOT government ownership of the means of production.
    The contrast case is the New York City pilot in 2026 of the
    La Marqueta municipal grocery model proposed by Zohran
    Mamdani, in which the city itself owns and operates a
    grocery store. This Act does not adopt that model. Division
    I contracts with private producers, distributors, and
    suppliers at cost plus a five percent (5%) facility
    surcharge. Wisconsin's dairy farms remain private. Cranberry
    bogs remain private. Cheese makers remain private. Trucks
    remain private. The state operates only the final retail
    point at cost. The Defense Commissary Agency has operated
    this exact contracting structure since 1867 without
    acquiring a single farm, and Fort McCoy's commissary in
    Sparta is the local proof. Costco operates a private-sector
    parallel: membership-based, volume purchasing, near-cost
    pricing, and profitable. The currency-based market economy
    survives for luxury, custom, artisanal, and specialty
    goods that exceed the resource library's scope. This Act
    provides a floor of material security, not a replacement
    for the market economy;

    (l3) PREEMPTIVE AUTOMATION-AND-JOBS FINDING. Aurora
    Innovation operates the first commercial driverless freight
    service on the Dallas-to-Houston corridor, with no safety
    driver in the cab, on public roads, today (Aurora
    Innovation operational announcements, 2024-2025). Waymo
    operates robotaxi service in San Francisco, Phoenix, and
    Los Angeles. Boston Dynamics' Atlas robot works ten-hour
    production shifts at Hyundai Motor Group; Figure 02
    contributed to the production of more than thirty thousand
    (30,000) vehicles at BMW's Spartanburg plant; Agility
    Robotics' Digit moved more than one hundred thousand
    (100,000) totes in Amazon and GXO Logistics warehouses.
    Retail bankruptcies in 2024 totaled forty-five (45), an
    eighty percent (80%) increase over 2023; fifteen thousand
    (15,000) store closures are projected for 2025. The
    distribution jobs that justified the 75.7 percent retail
    markup are being eliminated by autonomous freight, retail
    collapse, and warehouse automation independently of this
    Act. This Act does not eliminate distribution labor; it
    eliminates the profit markup applied on top of distribution
    labor. The Defense Commissary Agency has truckers; at-cost
    pricing did not eliminate their jobs. Adam Smith warned in
    Wealth of Nations Book V Chapter I Part III Article II
    about "the man whose whole life is spent in performing a
    few simple operations". Wisconsin knows this person. The
    state watched the Foxconn Mt. Pleasant promise of 13,000
    jobs and $10 billion investment scale down to a fraction
    while billions in state and county subsidies were already
    committed. Division I is the catch, not the throw: the
    food and commodity floor catches the worker the automation
    displaces;

    FINDINGS RELATING TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND HIERARCHY:

    (l) Sir Michael Marmot's Whitehall Studies, commencing in 1967
    and continuing to the present with 10,308 subjects, established
    that among British civil servants with universal healthcare, full
    employment, and no absolute poverty, the lowest employment grade
    experienced three times the mortality rate of the highest grade.
    Standard risk factors, smoking, cholesterol, blood pressure),
    explained less than forty percent of the mortality gradient. The
    hierarchy itself, independent of absolute material deprivation,
    produces lethal health outcomes;

    (m) Dr. Robert Sapolsky's thirty-year study of wild baboon
    populations in the Serengeti demonstrated that subordinate social
    position produces chronically elevated cortisol, atherosclerosis,
    immune suppression, and cognitive impairment. When a tuberculosis
    outbreak eliminated the most aggressive males from a troop,
    hierarchy collapsed, and subordinates' cortisol levels normalized,
    demonstrating that the health damage was caused by the hierarchy,
    not by inherent individual biology (Sapolsky, "Why Zebras Don't
    Get Ulcers," 1994; "Behave," 2017);

    (n) Dr. Carol Shively's thirty-year study of female macaques at
    Wake Forest University demonstrated that subordinate social status
    directly causes visceral fat accumulation, atherosclerosis, and
    coronary artery disease, with cingulate cortex serotonin
    identified as the neurological nexus linking depression to
    cardiovascular disease (Shively, 2009; 2014);

    (o) Dr. Elizabeth Blackburn, recipient of the 2009 Nobel Prize in
    Physiology or Medicine, demonstrated that chronic psychological
    stress shortens telomeres, the protective caps on chromosomal
    DNA, accelerating cellular aging. Caregivers of chronically ill
    children had measurably shorter telomeres proportional to years of
    stress. Poverty and subordination age human beings at the
    molecular level (Blackburn & Epel, "The Telomere Effect," 2017);

    (p) THE GRADIENT IS THE DISEASE. These findings collectively
    establish that the gap is the gradient, not the deprivation.
    Treating sickness downstream of an untreated gradient is
    documented to fail across four programs, six decades, three
    species. Hierarchy itself kills. Poverty and social hierarchy
    are not merely economic conditions but medical conditions with
    documented physiological pathways that produce measurable
    morbidity and mortality. The food and commodity assurance
    program established in this Act addresses the material rung
    of that gradient. This is not charity. This is engineering;

    (p1) THE TARGETING ERROR CORRECTED. Samuel Bowles and Herbert
    Gintis in Schooling in Capitalist America (1976) named the
    right disease at the wrong site. Stratification is the ocean,
    not the cup. The gradient is the disease; schools are
    downstream of it. Hierarchy itself kills, and the gradient
    runs through every institution. Targeting any single
    institution misses the structural mechanism (Cooper, Paper V,
    2026). This finding is the bipartisan-deliverability anchor of
    this Act: the food and commodity assurance program corrects
    the material rung of the gradient without attributing the
    gradient to teachers, schools, or any single profession;

    (p2) UNIVERSE 25 IS NOT ABUNDANCE. John Calhoun's Universe 25
    experiment (1968-1973) placed mice in an enclosure with
    unlimited food and water and observed behavioral collapse over
    successive generations. The experiment is often invoked against
    abundance programs. The invocation misreads the experiment.
    Calhoun put mice in a box with food. That is not abundance.
    That is inventory. Universe 25 supplied four inputs and nothing
    else: no education, no healthcare, no social roles, no conflict
    resolution, no intergenerational knowledge transfer. The United
    States military commissary, by contrast, has operated for one
    hundred fifty-nine (159) years under 10 U.S.C. Section 2484
    with full institutional scaffolding around the at-cost food
    floor (educational benefits, healthcare, structured service,
    intergenerational community at every installation including
    Fort McCoy in Sparta, Wisconsin) and has produced no Universe
    25 outcome. The Roman annona civica ran on the same scaffolded
    model for more than four hundred (400) years. The commissary
    is Universe 25 with institutional infrastructure, and it works.
    The infrastructure side of this Act is what distinguishes it
    from the experiment that abundance critics cite;

    (q) WISCONSIN FISCAL FLOOR. The food and commodity assurance
    program established in this Act, calibrated at three hundred
    nine dollars ($309) per Wisconsin resident per year for a base
    list of twenty-five (25) staple food items at thirty percent
    (30%) of cheapest retail price per USDA Food Dollar Series
    methodology, requires approximately one billion eight hundred
    forty-one million dollars ($1,841,000,000) per year against
    Wisconsin's approximately 5.96 million residents [SOURCE: U.S.
    Census Bureau Vintage 2025; USDA ERS Food Dollar Series, 2024].
    This is approximately eight and two-tenths percent (8.2%) of
    Wisconsin's FY2025 actual General Purpose Revenue of
    twenty-two billion three hundred sixty-three million dollars
    ($22,362,600,000) [SOURCE: Wisconsin Department of Revenue
    Fiscal Year 2025 Collections Report]. Wisconsin ended FY2025
    with an undesignated General Fund balance of approximately
    four billion six hundred six million dollars ($4,606,000,000)
    [SOURCE: Wisconsin Department of Administration FY25 Annual
    Fiscal Report, October 15, 2025]. The fiscal capacity exists.
    The question is operational, not budgetary. Denial is no
    longer neutral (Cooper, Paper III, 2025; Cooper, Paper VII,
    2026).

SUBCHAPTER I: WISCONSIN FOOD AND COMMODITY, ASSURANCE ACT

SECTION 2. Creation of Chapter 93, Subchapter IX, Wisconsin Food Assurance Program.

    93.70 DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter:

    (1) "At-cost distribution" means the provision of goods at the
    verified cost of production, processing, and delivery, without
    markup for profit, brokerage, advertising, or speculative
    intermediation.

    (2) "Commissary model" means a system of food distribution
    modeled on the United States Defense Commissary Agency as
    established by 10 U.S.C. Section 2484, providing food at cost
    plus a surcharge not to exceed five (5) percent for facility
    maintenance, with no profit component.

    (3) "Department" means the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture,
    Trade and Consumer Protection.

    (4) "Food assurance distribution center" means a state-operated
    or state-contracted facility providing food and grocery items to
    eligible residents at at-cost pricing.

    (5) "Production cost" means the farm share of food value as
    determined by the United States Department of Agriculture Economic
    Research Service Food Dollar Series, plus verified processing and
    transportation costs, as certified by the department.

    (6) "Resident" means a person whose primary residence is
    located in the State of Wisconsin.

    93.71 WISCONSIN FOOD ASSURANCE PROGRAM; CREATION.

    (1) There is created the Wisconsin Food Assurance Program,
    administered by the department in coordination with the
    Department of Health Services and the Department of
    Administration.

    (2) The program shall establish food assurance distribution
    centers throughout the state, with priority placement in:
        (a) Communities designated as food deserts by the United
        States Department of Agriculture;
        (b) Counties with food insecurity rates exceeding the
        state average;
        (c) Rural communities that have lost grocery retail
        access due to store closures;
        (d) Municipalities with populations exceeding 25,000
        that lack adequate grocery access within one mile for
        urban areas or ten miles for rural areas.

    (3) All food assurance distribution centers shall operate
    under the commissary model, providing the full diversity of
    grocery items, including produce, meat, dairy, packaged
    goods, cleaning supplies, and personal care items, at
    production cost plus a surcharge not exceeding five (5)
    percent for facility operations.

    (4) The department shall draw on Wisconsin's dairy, cranberry,
    and vegetable processing infrastructure to prioritize in-state
    sourcing. The department shall establish procurement
    agreements with Wisconsin dairy cooperatives, cranberry
    growers, vegetable producers, and food processing facilities
    to minimize supply chain costs and capitalize on the state's
    existing agricultural capacity.

    93.72 ELIGIBILITY.

    (1) All Wisconsin residents shall be eligible to purchase
    food at at-cost pricing from food assurance distribution
    centers, subject only to verification of Wisconsin residency
    as determined by department rule under Chapter 227.

    (2) During the implementation period established in Section
    6 of this Act, the department shall extend at-cost
    purchasing privileges on a phased basis, beginning with:
        (a) Residents certified as food insecure by the Department of
        Health Services;
        (b) Residents receiving FoodShare Wisconsin benefits;
        (c) Residents whose household income does not exceed two
        hundred (200) percent of the federal poverty level;
        (d) All Wisconsin residents, upon full implementation.

    93.73 SOURCING AND SUPPLY CHAIN.

    (1) The department shall establish a state food procurement system
    that:
        (a) Purchases directly from Wisconsin producers at fair market
        rates certified by the department;
        (b) Eliminates intermediary markup between producer and
        distribution center;
        (c) Maintains the full diversity of food products available in
        commercial grocery retail;
        (d) Ensures year-round availability through strategic reserves,
        cold storage, and procurement from out-of-state sources when
        Wisconsin production is insufficient.

    (2) The department shall prioritize Wisconsin-produced dairy, meat,
    produce, cranberries, ginseng, corn, soybeans, potatoes, snap
    beans, and other products for which the state is a leading national
    producer.

    93.74 ESSENTIAL GOODS PROGRAM.

    (1) The department, in coordination with the Department of
    Workforce Development, shall establish the Wisconsin Essential
    Goods Program to provide household commodities, clothing,
    tools, and basic consumer goods at below-retail pricing
    through state-operated or state-contracted distribution
    facilities.

    (2) The program shall draw on Wisconsin's manufacturing sector,
    comprising approximately ninety-two thousand (92,000) firms
    employing approximately five hundred seventy-five thousand
    (575,000) workers and generating approximately seventy billion
    dollars ($70,000,000,000) annually [SOURCE: Thomasnet
    Wisconsin Manufacturing Evolution, 2025], to source goods
    from in-state manufacturers at production cost wherever
    feasible. This finding ratifies the diagnostic Veblen
    identified more than a century ago: Wisconsin's productive
    capacity is sufficient; the constraint is the distribution
    layer that absorbs 75.7 cents of every consumer dollar
    [SOURCE: USDA ERS Food Dollar Series, 2024].

    (3) The essential goods program shall distribute goods on a
    tiered basis according to permanence:

        (a) Consumables (food, cleaning supplies, personal care
        items): constant flow, replenished weekly at the food
        assurance distribution centers established under Section
        93.71;

        (b) Semi-permanent goods (clothing, linens, small tools):
        need-based distribution with anti-hoarding provisions
        determined by department rule (one hundred shirts in one
        month constitutes hoarding, not need).

        (c) Luxury, custom, artisanal, and specialty goods
        outside the scope of this program remain in the market
        economy and are purchased through the currency-based
        retail system. This Act provides a floor of material
        security, not a replacement for the market economy.

    93.75 FISCAL IMPACT AND COST ANALYSIS.

    (1) The legislature finds that the following fiscal analysis
    supports the feasibility of the Wisconsin Food Assurance
    Program:

        (a) Wisconsin population: approximately 5.96 million
        [SOURCE: U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts Wisconsin
        PST045224; Census Bureau Vintage 2025];

        (b) Division I per-capita food assurance target: $309 per
        Wisconsin resident per year for a base list of
        twenty-five (25) staple food items at thirty percent
        (30%) of cheapest retail price per USDA Food Dollar
        Series methodology;

        (c) Steady-state Division I program cost: approximately
        $1,841,000,000 per year (5.96M x $309);

        (d) Wisconsin FY2025 actual General Purpose Revenue
        (state-only operating fund): approximately
        $22,362,600,000 [SOURCE: Wisconsin Department of Revenue
        Fiscal Year 2025 Collections Report];

        (e) Steady-state Division I program cost as percentage of
        FY2025 GPR: approximately 8.2 percent;

        (f) Steady-state Division I program cost as percentage of
        2025-27 biennial all-funds appropriation ($111.1B per
        2025 Wisconsin Act 15): approximately 1.66 percent.

    (2) The legislature further finds that current costs of food
    insecurity in Wisconsin, including emergency healthcare,
    chronic disease treatment attributable to nutritional
    deficiency, productivity losses, social services
    administration, and food assistance program overhead,
    substantially offset the cost of direct at-cost food
    provision. Every dollar spent on food insecurity prevention
    returns an estimated two to three dollars in reduced
    healthcare and social service expenditures (Cooper, Paper III,
    2025; Feeding America Eastern Wisconsin Map the Meal Gap
    2023 data).

    (3) The legislature further finds that Wisconsin already
    expends significant state resources on food assistance
    through FoodShare Wisconsin (~700,000 enrollment per
    Wisconsin Department of Health Services FoodShare Wisconsin
    Data, March 2026), the Emergency Food Assistance Program,
    school meal programs, and other food security initiatives.
    This Act consolidates and rationalizes those expenditures
    into a unified program that addresses the root cause, the
    distribution failure documented at 75.7 cents of every food
    dollar per the USDA ERS Food Dollar Series, rather than its
    symptoms.

[SUBCHAPTERS II AND III: SEE COMPANION ACT]

The public-health operative provisions formerly grouped under Subchapter II of this Act (Chapter 250, Subchapter V, Wisconsin Department of Health Services operative duties) are not retained in this food and commodity assurance Act. The underlying findings on hierarchy as a public health condition (Marmot Whitehall, Sapolsky, Shively, Blackburn) are retained as the closing evidentiary block of Section 1 above, paragraphs (l) through (p2), where they function as the physiological proof that the food and commodity assurance program reaches beyond bare survival-stress.

The K-20 Education Modernization provisions formerly grouped under Subchapter III of this Act (Section 118.15 compulsory-school amendment, Section 115.42 K-20 Education Pipeline, Chapter 36 amendments for the University of Wisconsin System, Chapter 38 amendments for the Wisconsin Technical College System) are extracted in full to the companion Wisconsin Education Modernization Act, to be filed separately. The Vitruvian Quotient framework, the Meyerhoff Proof at Scale, the Classical anchor, the Adam Smith conservative lock (Wealth of Nations Book V, Chapter I, Part III, Articles II and III), the Erikson stages, Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development, Bjork's desirable difficulties, Luthar's affluence-pathology research, the van Gennep / Turner structured-ordeals literature, the Universal Credit Transfer Agreement, and the Wisconsin K-12 funding findings travel with that companion bill.

The Wisconsin Public Service and Resource Library Program formerly grouped under Section 9 of this Act (Section 16.90 Public Service plus tiered Resource Library) is extracted in full to the same companion Act, to be filed separately.

This Act addresses food and commodity assurance only.

SECTION 4. APPROPRIATIONS

    This is not charity. This is engineering. The Defense
    Commissary Agency has operated under 10 U.S.C. Section 2484
    for one hundred fifty-nine (159) years at facilities
    including Fort McCoy in Sparta, Wisconsin, at cost plus a
    five percent (5%) surcharge with no profit by law. The
    appropriation below extends the same operational template
    to the residents of this state who fund that federal
    apparatus through their taxes.

    (1) APPROPRIATION. There is appropriated from the General
    Purpose Revenue Fund to the Department of Agriculture, Trade
    and Consumer Protection, for the biennium beginning July 1,
    2028:

        (a) For the Wisconsin Food Assurance Program established
        in Section 2 of this Act and Section 93.71 of the
        Wisconsin Statutes: not less than seventy million dollars
        ($70,000,000) annually for pilot operations and start-up
        capacity, with full implementation phased in over five
        (5) fiscal years to reach the steady-state operational
        target of approximately one billion eight hundred
        forty-one million dollars ($1,841,000,000) per year set
        forth in the closing fiscal convergence findings below
        (approximately eight and two-tenths percent (8.2%) of
        FY2025 General Purpose Revenue, approximately 0.32
        percent in pilot year one);

        (b) For the Wisconsin Essential Goods Program established
        in Section 2 of this Act and Section 93.74 of the
        Wisconsin Statutes: not less than thirty million dollars
        ($30,000,000) annually for pilot operations and start-up
        capacity, with full implementation phased in over the
        same five-year horizon.

    (2) FISCAL OFFSETS. The legislature finds that:

        (a) Wisconsin already expends significant state resources
        on food assistance through FoodShare Wisconsin, the
        Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP), school meal
        programs, and other food security initiatives. This Act
        consolidates and rationalizes those expenditures into a
        unified at-cost program that addresses the distribution
        layer that absorbs 75.7 cents of every food dollar per
        the USDA Economic Research Service Food Dollar Series;

        (b) Wisconsin ended FY2025 with an undesignated General
        Fund balance of approximately four billion six hundred
        six million dollars ($4,606,000,000) [SOURCE: Wisconsin
        Department of Administration FY25 Annual Fiscal Report,
        October 15, 2025], a fiscal cushion that comfortably
        absorbs the pilot-year appropriation;

        (c) The federal SNAP administrative cost-shift from 50
        percent to 75 percent state share, effective October 1,
        2026, under federal H.R. 1 (2025), imposes an unfunded
        state obligation that the at-cost routing of Section 2
        offsets through a 3.9-fold per-SNAP-dollar increase in
        food delivered to recipients;

        (d) The full Division I steady-state target of
        approximately $1.841 billion is approximately 8.2 percent
        of FY2025 General Purpose Revenue of $22.363 billion
        [SOURCE: Wisconsin Department of Revenue Fiscal Year
        2025 Collections Report]. The phase-in schedule begins
        with the pilot appropriation in subsection (1) and ramps
        through legislative appropriation in subsequent biennia.

    (3) The detailed fiscal convergence calculation, with inline
    source-tagged figures, appears in the closing block of this
    Act under the heading DIVISION I FOOD PROGRAM TARGET, THE
    FISCAL CONVERGENCE, and THE FISCAL LOCK.

SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY AND CONSTRUCTION

    (1) SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this act or its application
    to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity does
    not affect other provisions or applications of this act that can
    be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and
    to this end the provisions of this act are severable.

    (2) CONSTRUCTION. This act shall be liberally construed to
    effectuate its purposes.

    (3) SUPREMACY. Where this act conflicts with existing provisions
    of the Wisconsin Statutes, the provisions of this act shall
    control, except that this act shall not be construed to diminish
    any right, benefit, or protection provided under existing law that
    exceeds the protections established herein.

SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATES AND IMPLEMENTATION

    (1) EFFECTIVE DATE. This Act takes effect on July 1, 2028,
    coinciding with the beginning of the FY2028-2029 state
    fiscal year.

    (2) IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE.

        (a) PHASE 1 (Fiscal Years 1-2, FY2028-FY2030): The
        Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection
        shall establish the first food assurance distribution
        centers in communities designated as food deserts,
        beginning with the ten (10) counties with the highest
        food insecurity rates per Feeding America Map the Meal
        Gap and Wisconsin Department of Health Services
        FoodShare Wisconsin caseload data. The Legislative
        Fiscal Bureau shall prepare detailed cost analyses for
        the Joint Committee on Finance.

        (b) PHASE 2 (Fiscal Years 3-4, FY2030-FY2032): Expansion
        of food assurance distribution centers to all counties
        carrying food insecurity rates at or above the state
        average. Essential Goods Program pilot operations
        commence at not less than four (4) distribution centers.

        (c) PHASE 3 (Fiscal Years 5-7, FY2032-FY2035): Full
        statewide operation of the Food Assurance Program with
        in-state sourcing agreements executed with Wisconsin
        dairy cooperatives, cranberry growers, vegetable
        producers, ginseng producers, and food processing
        facilities. Essential Goods Program reaches full
        operational scope.

    (3) REPORTING. The departments charged with implementation
    under this Act shall report annually to the Joint Committee on
    Finance on implementation progress, fiscal impact, and program
    outcomes.

---

    THE FEDERAL SNAP COST-SHIFT. Federal H.R. 1 (2025) increased
    the state share of SNAP administrative costs from fifty percent
    to seventy-five percent, effective October 1, 2026. This state
    routes SNAP benefits through commercial retail where 75.7 cents
    of every dollar pays for markup. At at-cost routing through
    Division I, approximately 95 cents reaches recipients as food
    a 3.9-fold increase per SNAP dollar that offsets the federal
    cost-shift.

    DIVISION I FOOD PROGRAM TARGET. The at-cost food assurance
    program established in Division I, serving Wisconsin's
    population of approximately five and ninety-six hundredths
    million (5,960,000) residents [SOURCE: U.S. Census Bureau
    QuickFacts Wisconsin PST045224; Census Bureau Vintage 2025
    state population estimates released May 14, 2026], requires
    approximately one billion eight hundred forty-one million
    dollars ($1,841,000,000) per year at production cost ($309
    per person per year for a base list of twenty-five (25)
    staple food items at thirty percent (30%) of cheapest retail
    price per USDA Food Dollar Series methodology). Against
    Wisconsin's FY2025 actual General Purpose Revenue
    (state-only operating fund) of approximately twenty-two
    billion three hundred sixty-three million dollars
    ($22,363,000,000) [SOURCE: Wisconsin Department of Revenue
    Fiscal Year 2025 Collections Report; Wisconsin Department
    of Administration FY25 Annual Fiscal Report, October 15,
    2025], this represents approximately eight and two-tenths
    percent (8.2%) of GPR. Across the 2025-27 biennium, total
    all-funds appropriations are approximately one hundred
    eleven and one-tenth billion dollars ($111,100,000,000) per
    2025 Wisconsin Act 15 [SOURCE: Wisconsin Counties
    Association Final Budget Summary, July 7, 2025].

    THE FISCAL CONVERGENCE. The arithmetic says ending the gap
    costs single-digit percentage of the markup the state
    already pays [SOURCE: USDA Food Dollar Series, 2024]. The
    operational template has run for one hundred fifty-nine
    (159) years inside the same federal apparatus the state
    already funds [SOURCE: 10 U.S.C. § 2484; Defense Commissary
    Agency, 2026; Fort McCoy Commissary, operational]. Wisconsin
    is not asked to attempt something untested. Wisconsin is
    asked to deliver to its own residents what its veterans
    have received since 1867.

    THE FISCAL LOCK. The argument that this state cannot afford
    this Act is refuted by the state's existing expenditure on
    the less efficient version of the same programs while
    absorbing a federal SNAP cost-shift the state did not
    request. The fiscal question is not whether to spend, but
    whether to continue spending approximately four times (4x)
    as much as required to accomplish the same objective.
    DENIAL IS NO LONGER NEUTRAL.

SECTION 7. CONSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT

    Article IV of the Wisconsin Constitution vests legislative
    power in the Senate and Assembly. Nothing in this Act exceeds
    that grant. The food and commodity assurance program
    established by Section 2 falls within the historic state
    police power over the general welfare and the express
    legislative authority over the Department of Agriculture,
    Trade and Consumer Protection under Chapter 93 of the
    Wisconsin Statutes.

    The constitutional education obligation under Article X,
    Section 3 of the Wisconsin Constitution, as construed by the
    Wisconsin Supreme Court in Vincent v. Voight, 2000 WI 93, 236
    Wis. 2d 588, 614 N.W.2d 388 (Case No. 97-3174), is addressed
    by the companion Wisconsin Education Modernization Act, filed
    separately.

REFERENCES

---

NOTE: The education-only references previously listed in this Act (Erikson, Vygotsky, Bjork, Luthar, Van Gennep, Turner, Jackson, Bowles & Gintis, Illich, Hirsch, Smith Book V, Bloom, Gardner, Goleman, Bar-On, Holland, Hrabowski/Meyerhoff, the Vitruvian Quotient citations, and the Universal Credit Transfer Agreement references) travel with the Wisconsin Education Modernization Act, filed separately, where they support the Division III operative provisions extracted under Option B (2026-05-24).

FOOD AND COMMODITY DATA:

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. "Wisconsin 2025

    Agricultural Statistics." Cash receipts from farm marketings:
    $15.3 billion (2024). Milk sales: $6.97 billion. Cheese
    production: 3.58 billion pounds.

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. "Wisconsin Cranberry

    Production, 2024." 5.49 million barrels, 62% of national crop.

USDA Economic Research Service. "Food Dollar Series" (2024

    release). Farm share: 24.3 cents per dollar; marketing
    share: 75.7 cents per dollar.

USDA Economic Research Service. "Food Expenditure Series."

    Food-at-home spending: $1.09 trillion.

Feeding America Eastern Wisconsin. "Map the Meal Gap" (2023

    data). Nearly 1 in 8 food insecure in service area.

Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA), 10 U.S.C. Section 2484.

    159 years of continuous at-cost food distribution under the
    no-profit pricing statute. 236 stores worldwide, ~$4
    billion annual sales, 17-25 percent CONUS savings, up to 44 percent overseas
    savings, ~$1.3 billion annual federal appropriation.

Thomasnet. "Wisconsin's 200-Year Manufacturing Evolution" (2025).

    Manufacturing sector: $70 billion annually, 575,000 workers,
    92,000 firms.

Cooper, I. (2025). "The Mathematics of Abundance: Two Proofs That

    Scarcity Is a Policy Choice." Paper III.

Cooper, I. (2025). "Stolen Futures: The Intergenerational Theft

    of Technical Possibility." Paper IV.

HIERARCHY AND HEALTH (closing evidentiary block):

Marmot, M. G. et al. (1978-present). The Whitehall Studies. Marmot, M. (2004). The Status Syndrome. Marmot, M. (2015). The Health Gap. Sapolsky, R. M. (1994/2004). Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers. Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave. Shively, C. A. et al. (2009). Social Stress and Coronary Artery

    Atherosclerosis.

Blackburn, E. & Epel, E. (2017). The Telomere Effect. Calhoun, J. B. (1962). "Population Density and Social

    Pathology." Scientific American 206(2): 139-148. (Universe
    25 rebuttal anchor)

Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in Capitalist

    America. (targeting-error anchor cited under Cooper Paper
    V correction)

Cooper, I. (2026). Paper V: The Targeting Error.

HISTORICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PRECEDENT:

Suetonius. Life of Augustus, 27 (Loeb Classical Library).

    Pinarius execution and the annona civica.

Cassius Dio. Roman History (Loeb Classical Library). Annona

    and Nerva alimenta.

Appian. Civil Wars 4.5 (Loeb Classical Library). CIL XI 1147. Tabula Alimentaria from Veleia. Museo

    Archeologico Nazionale di Parma. Bronze inscription
    recording loan amounts, land parcels, and child-support
    payments under the Nerva alimenta program.

Yang, X. et al. (2024). "Lake-centred sedentary lifestyle of

    early Tibetan Plateau Indigenous populations at high
    elevation 4,400 years ago." Nature Ecology & Evolution,
    September 2024.

Brinkhuis, H. et al. (2006). "Episodic fresh surface waters in

    the Eocene Arctic Ocean." Nature 441: 606-609. The Eocene
    Azolla Event.

Penck, A. (1925). Earth carrying capacity calculations. Cohen, J. (1995). How Many People Can the Earth Support? Fresco, J. (2007). Designing the Future.

ECONOMICS AND WISCONSIN-NATIVE-SON ANCHOR:

Galbraith, J. K. (1958). The Affluent Society. Veblen, T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class. Veblen, T. (1921). The Engineers and the Price System.

    (the "conscious withdrawal of efficiency")

Wisconsin Historical Society. "Thorstein Veblen." MNopedia. "Veblen, Thorstein Bunde (1857-1929)." Born July 30,

    1857, Cato Township, Manitowoc County, Wisconsin.

WISCONSIN LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL:

Wisconsin Constitution, Article IV (Legislative Power). Wisconsin Constitution, Article IV, Section 17 (Enacting

    Clause).

Wisconsin Constitution, Article V, Section 10 (Veto Power and

    Partial Veto Authority).

Wisconsin Constitution, Article X, Section 3 (Education

    Obligation, referenced in Section 7 Constitutional Context;
    full case-law treatment travels with the companion
    Wisconsin Education Modernization Act).

Wisconsin Constitution, Article XIII, Section 10 (Advisory

    Referenda).

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 93 (Agriculture, Trade and Consumer

    Protection; the primary chapter amended by this Act).

Wisconsin Statutes Chapter 100 (Marketing; Trade Practices). Wisconsin Statutes Section 13.093 (Joint Committee on Finance). Wisconsin Statutes Section 13.10 (Joint Committee on Finance

    Powers).

Wisconsin Joint Rules 41, 52. Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau. Wisconsin Department of Revenue, Fiscal Year 2025 Collections

    Report. GPR taxes $22,362.6 million.

Wisconsin Department of Administration, FY25 Annual Fiscal

    Report (October 15, 2025).

Wisconsin Counties Association, Final Budget Summary,

    2025 Wisconsin Act 15 (July 7, 2025). $111.1 billion
    biennial all-funds.

Wisconsin Department of Health Services, FoodShare Wisconsin

    Data (March 2026). ~700,000 enrollment.

U.S. Census Bureau, QuickFacts Wisconsin PST045224; Vintage

    2025 state population estimates (released May 14, 2026).

WISCONSIN ROSE-EQUIVALENT (travels to companion Education Modernization Act):

Vincent v. Voight, 2000 WI 93, 236 Wis. 2d 588, 614 N.W.2d 388

    (Case No. 97-3174). Wisconsin Supreme Court holding on the
    fundamental right to an equal opportunity for a sound basic
    education.

HISTORICAL APOPLEXY FRAMEWORK (Cooper):

Cooper, I. (2025). Historical Apoplexy: On the Stroke-Like

    Loss of Civilizational Memory. Paper I.

Cooper, I. (2026). Paper II: Historical Arc. Cooper, I. (2025). Paper III: The Mathematics of Abundance. Cooper, I. (2025). Paper IV: Stolen Futures. Cooper, I. (2026). Paper V: The Targeting Error. Cooper, I. (2026). Paper VI: The Resuscitation Document. Cooper, I. (2026). Paper VII: The Structural Overload (federal

    overload and multi-executive precedent; anchors Section 1
    findings (a0) and (a0a)).

Cooper, I. (2026). Paper VIII: Venus Prime (biological-abundance

    principle; anchors finding (l1c) Azolla deployable today
    at state-agricultural scale).

Cooper, I. (2026). Paper X: The Maturity Void (PIAAC, the

    1-in-6,700 compound-competency calculation, structured
    adversity under abundance; travels with the companion
    Wisconsin Education Modernization Act).

END OF BILL

    Wisconsin Food, Resource, and Commodity Assurance Act
    Prepared for introduction in the Wisconsin State Legislature
    One Hundred Seventh Legislature, 2025-2026 Session

    Adapted from the original 2016 Colorado proposal developed through
    the Sassafras and Maple Research Foundation (SMRF)

    Research foundation: Historical Apoplexy (Cooper, 2025-2026)

    "The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and
     assembly, do enact as follows."

    The state that gave the world Thorstein Veblen, who diagnosed the
    disease of conspicuous consumption and the conscious withdrawal of
    efficiency, now has the opportunity to write the prescription.

---

Verification notes & full source chain

Constitutional path: Legislative path only.

Distribution-model precedent: The U.S. Defense Commissary Agency (10 U.S.C. § 2484), operational since 1867, sells groceries at cost plus a five-percent maintenance surcharge with no profit allowed by law. 2.8 million authorized users, more than 230 stores worldwide, $4 billion annual sales, $1.3 billion federal appropriation paid by all taxpayers including the 330+ million civilians denied access. This bill extends the same at-cost distribution model to all residents of Wisconsin.

Public-health-equity evidence: The Marmot Whitehall Studies (1967-present), Sapolsky's Masai Mara baboons, Shively's cynomolgus macaques, and Blackburn's Nobel-winning telomere research establish that hierarchy itself kills across four research programmes, six decades, and three species. The gap is the gradient. Food assurance reaches beyond bare survival because the gradient damages population health even where calorie minimums are met.

Abundance arithmetic: 293,000 U.S. manufacturing facilities at 77 percent utilization; 19.5-29.3× the productive overcapacity required to provide universal abundance in consumer goods. 47.9 million Americans food-insecure; $32 billion ends domestic hunger; $496 billion is the annual U.S. food-industry markup over production cost; the gap is operational evidence of manufactured scarcity, not evidence of resource constraint. See Paper III, The Mathematics of Abundance.